• slidebg1
  • slidebg1
  • Ragging in colleges: Educational institutions yet to implement SC guidelines
    Bengaluru, June 23: The incident in which a nursing student was forced to consume toilet cleaner in Read more...
  • locus to maintain appeal
    From the material placed on record, it is clear that the appellants have precise connection with the Read more...
  • Better to dance in bars than beg on streets
    Better to dance in bars than beg on streets: Supreme Court to Maharashtra "It is better to d Read more...
  • Constitution Of NCLT And NCLAT: A New Era Of Company Law Litigation In India
    The Ministry of Corporate Affairs ('MCA') on 1st June 2016 notified the constitution of Nati Read more...
  • Justice delayed: India’s top courts take 10-15 years to decided on a case, says Law ministry study
    New Delhi: A study commissioned by the Union Law ministry has thrown up some interesting findings wi Read more...
  • Congratulation......
    Congratulation on Launch of Online Sotfwares Supreme Court and Supreme Court Criminal 1950 onwards t Read more...
  • Factual situation in the case
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA - CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION - CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.416 OF 2016 (Ar Read more...
  • High Court did not consider the specific case
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA - CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION - CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.524 OF 2016 (Ar Read more...
  • IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL - APPELLATE JURISDICTION - CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1358 of 2008 - Read more...
  • |Judgement|2007(12)BLegal194|Bhaskar Eknathrao Shinde vs. State of Maharashtra'|
    31-12-2007|DOUBLE|IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY|

    [1] The petitioner, who claims to be founder/sugar-cane producer member of respondent no.3-sugar factory, by this petition, challenges the order passed by respondent no.2, rejecting the ob Read more...
  • |Judgement|1996(12)BLegal176|Jaffar Hussain Ebrahim vs. Taiyabali Dawoodji Rangwala'|
    31-12-1996|DOUBLE|IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA|

    KULDIP SINGH - This is a landlord`s appeal. He filed a suit for eviction of the respondent-tenant from the premises in dispute, inter alia, on the ground of sub-letting. The trial Court c Read more...
  • |Judgement|1996(12)BLegal177|Angarki Co Operative Housing Society Limited vs. State of Maharashtra'|
    31-12-1996|DOUBLE|IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA|

    KULDIP SINGH, J. - Special leave granted.

    [2] This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 9/07/1992, quashing the letter Read more...

  • |Judgement|1996(12)BLegal178|Union of India vs. C.K.Dharagupta'|
    31-12-1996|DOUBLE|IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA|

    KULDIP SINGH, J. - Special leave granted.

    [2] The question for consideration before the Central Administration Tribunal (The Tribunal) was whether the De Read more...

  • |Judgement|1990(12)BLegal103|Adarsh Gruba Nirman Suhakari Sanstha Ltd. : M.N.Bakade vs. K.K.Londhe'|
    31-12-1990|SINGLE|IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY|

    [1] Since common questions of law and facts are involved in both these appeals it is proposed to decide them by common judgment.

    [2] Both these appeals are directed against the order
    Read more...
  • |Judgement|1987(12)BLegal120|Ram V.K.S.(vikas) Seva Sanstha Ltd. vs. Kolhapur Zilla Madhyavarti Sahakari Bank Ltd'|
    31-12-1987|SINGLE|IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY|

    [1] The Appeal arises cut of the judgment and order passed by the learned trial Court of the co-operative Court no.1 at kolhapur on 29-9-1987 by which he Dismissed the application for injunctio Read more...
  • |Judgement|1978(12)BLegal47|State of Maharashtra vs. Sampat Tabaji Gangurde'|
    31-12-1978|DOUBLE|IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY|

    [1] This is an application by the state of Maharashtra for cancellation of the bail of the four accused who were released on bail bv this Court on 9-6-1977.When their Appeal against conviction Read more...
  • |Judgement|1952(12)BLegal23|Alla Malua Kurmi vs. Civil Judge Class I'|
    31-12-1952|DOUBLE|IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY|

    [1] This order will also govern the decisions of miscellaneous petitions nos.92 and 93 of 1952.These petitions are directed against the decisions of Shri S.N.Mishra, civil Judge, class i, raipu Read more...
  • |Judgement|2018(10)BLegal190|SEVAKBHAU NIRDHANGI WAGHAYE-PATIL vs. RETURNING OFFICER, SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SAKOLI and another'|
    31-10-2018|SINGLE|IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY|

    JUDGMENT :— By this Election Petition filed under section 81 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (for short, ‘the Act of 1951’), the petit Read more...
  • |Judgement|2017(10)BLegal47|National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and Ors.'|
    31-10-2017|FULL|IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA|

    Dipak Misra, CJI.
                Perceiving cleavage of opinion between Reshma Kumari and others v. Madan Mohan and another Read more...